Déclaration d'accessibilité

Sabre is committed to making son site internet accessible in accordance with Article 47 of Law No. 2005-102 of February 11, 2005.

To this end, it is implementing the following strategy and actions: the multi-year accessibility plan and the action plan are currently being drafted and will be published soon.

Compliance status

https://sabre-paris.com/ is partially compliant with the general framework for improving accessibility (RGAA), version 4 due to the non-compliances and exemptions listed below.

Test results

In progress.

The compliance audit carried out internally reveals that: 54% of the RGAA version 4 criteria are met.

Details of results:

  • Number of compliant criteria: 40
  • Number of non-compliant criteria: 10
  • Number of non-applicable criteria: 32

Non-accessible content

The contents listed below are not accessible for the following reasons.

Non-compliance

  • Each information-carrying image has no text alternative
  • Each decorative image is not correctly ignored by assistive technologies
  • Each frame has no title
  • For each frame with a title, the title is not relevant
  • In each web page, the contrast between text and background color is not high enough
  • In each web page, colors used in interface components or information-carrying graphic elements are not sufficiently contrasted
  • Each synchronized prerecorded time-based media lacks captions when necessary
  • Each prerecorded media lacks synchronized audio description when necessary
  • Each time-based media is not clearly identifiable
  • Each non-time-based media lacks an alternative when necessary
  • Each time-based and non-time-based media is not compatible with assistive technologies
  • For each data table, no technique is used to associate cells with their headers
  • Each link is not explicit
  • In each web page, each link has no label
  • In each web page, status messages are not correctly conveyed by assistive technologies
  • For each web page, the generated code is not valid according to the specified type
  • In each web page, tags are used only for presentation
  • In each web page, information is not structured using appropriate headings
  • In each web page, content is not understandable when styles are disabled
  • In each web page, CSS declarations for background and font colors are not correctly used
  • In each web page, non-obvious links are not visible compared to surrounding text
  • In each web page, information is conveyed only by shape, size, or position
  • In each web page, information conveyed by shape, size, or position is not implemented meaningfully
  • For each web page, content cannot be presented without loss of information or functionality and requires scrolling
  • In each web page, text spacing properties cannot be redefined without content or functionality loss
  • In each web page, additional content on focus or hover is not controllable by the user
  • In each web page, additional CSS-only content is not visible via keyboard or pointing device
  • Each form field has no label
  • Each label associated to a form field is not relevant
  • In each form, input validation has no suggestions to correct errors
  • The site map page is not relevant
  • In each page set, the site map page is not accessed consistently
  • In each web page, there is no skip link or shortcut to main content
  • In each page, functions needing complex gestures are not accessible via simple gestures

Derogations for disproportionate burden

No content to mention

Content not subject to the accessibility obligation

No content to mention

Detailed results by category

Images 3 / 5 compliant , 2 partial, 4 not applicable
Partially compliant Criterion 1.1 Does each information-carrying image have a text alternative?
Partially compliant Criterion 1.2 Is each decorative image properly ignored by assistive technologies?
Not applicable Criterion 1.3 For each information-carrying image with a text alternative, is this alternative relevant (excluding special cases)?
Compliant Criterion 1.4 For each CAPTCHA or test image with a text alternative, does this alternative identify the nature and function of the image?
Compliant Criterion 1.5 For each image used as a CAPTCHA, is there an alternative way to access the content or function of the CAPTCHA?
Not applicable Criterion 1.6 Does each information-carrying image have a detailed description, if necessary?
Not applicable Criterion 1.7 For each information-carrying image with a detailed description, is the description relevant?
Not applicable Criterion 1.8 Is each text image carrying information replaced with styled text when possible (excluding special cases)?
Compliant Criterion 1.9 Is each image caption, if necessary, properly linked to its corresponding image?
Frames 0 / 2 compliant , 2 partial
Partially compliant Criterion 2.1 Does each frame have a frame title?
Partially compliant Criterion 2.2 For each frame with a frame title, is this title relevant?
Colors 1 / 3 compliant , 2 partial
Compliant Criterion 3.1 In each web page, is information not conveyed solely by color?
Partially compliant Criterion 3.2 In each web page, is the contrast between text color and background color high enough (excluding special cases)?
Partially compliant Critère 3.3 In each web page, are colors used in interface components or graphical elements carrying information sufficiently contrasted (excluding special cases)?
Multimedia 4 / 9 compliant , 4 partial, 1 non-compliant, 4 not applicable
Compliant Critère 4.1 Does each prerecorded time-based media have a text transcript or audio description, if necessary?
Not applicable Critère 4.2 For each prerecorded time-based media with a transcript or an audio description, are they relevant (excluding special cases)?
Partially compliant Critère 4.3 Does each prerecorded synchronized time-based media have captions, if necessary?
Not applicable Critère 4.4 For each prerecorded synchronized time-based media with captions, are those captions relevant?
Partially compliant Critère 4.5 Does each prerecorded time-based media have a synchronized audio description, if necessary?
Not applicable Critère 4.6 For each prerecorded time-based media with a synchronized audio description, is it relevant?
Partially compliant Critère 4.7 Is each time-based media clearly identifiable (excluding special cases)?
Not compliant Critère 4.8 Does each non-time-based media have an alternative, if necessary?
Not applicable Critère 4.9 For each non-time-based media with an alternative, is this alternative relevant?
Compliant Critère 4.10 Is each automatically triggered sound controllable by the user?
Compliant Critère 4.11 Is the playback of each time-based media controllable via keyboard and pointing devices?
Compliant Critère 4.12 Is the playback of each non-time-based media controllable via keyboard and pointing devices?
Partially compliant Critère 4.13 Is each time-based and non-time-based media compatible with assistive technologies (excluding special cases)?
Tables 1 / 2 compliant , 1 non-compliant, 6 not applicable
Not applicable Critère 5.1 Does each complex data table have a summary?
Not applicable Critère 5.2 For each complex data table with a summary, is the summary relevant?
Not applicable Critère 5.3 For each layout table, is the linearized content understandable?
Not applicable Critère 5.4 For each data table with a title, is the title correctly associated with the table?
Not applicable Critère 5.5 For each data table with a title, is the title relevant?
Compliant Critère 5.6 For each data table, are column and row headers correctly marked up?
Not compliant Critère 5.7 For each data table, is the appropriate technique used to associate each cell with its headers (excluding special cases)?
Not applicable Critère 5.8 Does each layout table avoid using data table elements? Is this rule respected?
Links 0 / 2 compliant , 1 partial, 1 non-compliant
Partially compliant Critère 6.1 Is each link explicit (excluding special cases)?
Not compliant Critère 6.2 In each web page, is the generated source code valid according to the specified document type (excluding special cases)?
Scripts 3 / 4 compliant , 1 non-compliant, 1 not applicable
Not applicable Critère 7.1 Is each script compatible with assistive technologies, if necessary?
Compliant Critère 7.2 For each script with an alternative, is this alternative relevant?
Compliant Critère 7.3 Is each script controllable by keyboard and pointing devices (excluding special cases)?
Compliant Critère 7.4 For each script initiating a context change, is the user warned or given control?
Not compliant Critère 7.5 In each web page, are status messages correctly conveyed by assistive technologies?
Code Structure 5 / 7 compliant , 2 partial, 3 not applicable
Compliant Critère 8.1 Is each web page defined by a document type?
Partially compliant Critère 8.2 For each web page, is the language code valid and relevant for each language change?
Compliant Critère 8.3 In each web page, is the default language specified?
Compliant Critère 8.4 For each web page with a default language, is the language code relevant?
Compliant Critère 8.5 Does each web page have a page title?
Compliant Critère 8.6 For each web page with a page title, is this title relevant?
Not applicable Critère 8.7 In each web page, is every language change indicated in the source code (excluding special cases)?
Not applicable Critère 8.8 In each web page, does every link have a label?
Partially compliant Critère 8.9 In each web page, are tags not used solely for presentation purposes?
Not applicable Critère 8.10 In each web page, are direction changes indicated?
Information Structuring 2 / 3 compliant , 1 partial, 1 not applicable
Partially compliant Critère 9.1 In each web page, is information structured with the proper use of headings?
Compliant Critère 9.2 In each web page, is the document structure consistent (excluding special cases)?
Not applicable Critère 9.3 In each web page, is every list correctly structured?
Compliant Critère 9.4 In each web page, is every quotation properly marked up?
Information Presentation 4 / 13 compliant , 6 partial, 3 non-compliant, 1 not applicable
Compliant Critère 10.1 In the website, are style sheets used to control the presentation of information?
Compliant Critère 10.2 In each web page, does visible information remain when style sheets are disabled?
Partially compliant Critère 10.3 In each web page, is information still understandable when style sheets are disabled?
Compliant Critère 10.4 In each web page, is text still readable when the font size is increased by up to 200% (excluding special cases)?
Not compliant Critère 10.5 In each web page, are CSS declarations for background and font colors correctly used?
Partially compliant Critère 10.6 In each web page, is each non-obvious link visible compared to surrounding text?
Compliant Critère 10.7 In each web page, for elements receiving focus, is the focus visible?
Not applicable Critère 10.8 For each web page, are hidden contents skipped by assistive technologies as intended?
Partially compliant Critère 10.9 In each web page, is information not conveyed solely by shape, size, or position?
Not compliant Critère 10.10 In each web page, is information conveyed by shape, size, or position implemented meaningfully?
Partially compliant Critère 10.11 For each web page, can content be presented without loss of information or functionality and without requiring scrolling in small windows?
Partially compliant Critère 10.12 In each web page, can text spacing properties be redefined by the user without content or functionality loss (excluding special cases)?
Not compliant Critère 10.13 In each web page, are additional contents appearing on focus or hover controllable by the user (excluding special cases)?
Partially compliant Critère 10.14 In each web page, can additional contents triggered only via CSS be made visible via keyboard and pointing devices?
Forms 7 / 10 compliant , 3 partial, 3 not applicable
Partially compliant Critère 11.1 Does each form field have a label?
Partially compliant Critère 11.2 For each form field, is the associated label relevant (excluding special cases)?
Compliant Critère 11.3 In each form, are labels associated with fields serving the same function consistent across pages?
Compliant Critère 11.4 In each form, are field labels and fields placed close together (excluding special cases)?
Compliant Critère 11.5 In each form, are fields of the same nature grouped when necessary?
Not applicable Critère 11.6 In each form, does each group of related fields have a legend?
Not applicable Critère 11.7 In each form, is each legend associated with a related group relevant?
Compliant Critère 11.8 In each form, are items of the same nature in choice lists grouped meaningfully?
Compliant Critère 11.9 In each form, is each button label relevant (excluding special cases)?
Compliant Critère 11.10 In each form, is input validation used meaningfully (excluding special cases)?
Partially compliant Critère 11.11 In each form, is input validation accompanied with suggestions to correct errors when necessary?
Compliant Critère 11.12 For each form modifying or deleting data, submitting exam answers, or with financial/legal consequences, can user input be reviewed or corrected before submission?
Not applicable Critère 11.13 Can the purpose of form fields be inferred to facilitate autofill with user data?
Navigation 5 / 8 compliant , 1 partial, 2 non-compliant, 3 not applicable
Compliant Critère 12.1 Does each set of pages provide at least two navigation systems (excluding special cases)?
Compliant Critère 12.2 In each set of pages, are menus and navigation bars always in the same place (excluding special cases)?
Not compliant Critère 12.3 Is the “site map” page relevant?
Not compliant Critère 12.4 In each set of pages, is the “site map” page accessible in the same way?
Compliant Critère 12.5 In each set of pages, is the search engine accessible in the same way?
Not applicable Critère 12.6 Can common content areas (header, main navigation, main content, footer, search) be reached or avoided consistently across pages?
Partially compliant Critère 12.7 In each web page, is there a skip link or quick access link to the main content (excluding special cases)?
Compliant Critère 12.8 In each web page, is the tab order coherent?
Compliant Critère 12.9 In each web page, does navigation avoid keyboard traps?
Not applicable Critère 12.10 In each web page, are single-key shortcuts (letters, numbers, punctuation, symbols) controllable by the user?
Not applicable Critère 12.11 In each web page, are additional contents triggered by hover, focus, or activation accessible via keyboard, if necessary?
Consultation 5 / 6 compliant , 1 non-compliant, 6 not applicable
Not applicable Critère 13.1 For each web page, does the user have control over time limits affecting content (excluding special cases)?
Compliant Critère 13.2 In each web page, is opening a new window not triggered without user action?
Compliant Critère 13.3 In each web page, does each downloadable document have an accessible version, if necessary?
Not applicable Critère 13.4 For each accessible version of a document, does it provide the same information?
Compliant Critère 13.5 In each web page, does each cryptic content (ASCII art, emoticon, cryptic syntax) have an alternative?
Compliant Critère 13.6 For each cryptic content with an alternative, is the alternative relevant?
Not applicable Critère 13.7 In each web page, are sudden brightness changes or flashing effects correctly used?
Not applicable Critère 13.8 In each web page, is moving or blinking content controllable by the user?
Compliant Critère 13.9 In each web page, is the content usable regardless of screen orientation (portrait or landscape) (excluding special cases)?
Not compliant Critère 13.10 In each web page, are functions requiring complex gestures also accessible by simple gestures (excluding special cases)?
Not applicable Critère 13.11 In each web page, can actions triggered by a single pointer on screen be undone (excluding special cases)?
Not applicable Critère 13.12 In each web page, are functions requiring device motion achievable in alternative ways (excluding special cases)?

Establishment of this accessibility statement

This statement was drawn up on 01/09/2025. It was updated on 28/10/2025.

Technologies used for the implementation of the site

  • Shopify Liquid
  • HTML5
  • CSS
  • JavaScript

Test environment

Operating Systems

  • Apple Mac OS X 13.4
  • Microsoft Windows 11
  • Apple iOS 16
  • Google Android 13

Browsers and Software

In the latest versions available on the different operating systems:

  • Google Chrome
  • Windows Edge
  • Safari
  • Brave
  • Adobe Acrobat Reader / Preview on Mac (for PDFs only)

Tools used for the assessment

  • Mouse emulations, screen magnifiers, and keyboards for different systems.
  • VoiceOver (Apple systems only)
  • TalkBack (Android systems only)
  • NVDA 2024 and Freedom Scientific JAWS 2022 (PC systems only)
  • Tanaguru webext RGAA4
  • Assistant RGAA
  • Graphic assessment tools available on different systems (colors, contrasts, subtitles, etc.)

Feedback and contact

If you are unable to access a content or a service, you can contact the person in charge of Sabre to be directed to an accessible alternative or to obtain the content in another form.

Appeal procedures

If you notice an accessibility issue that prevents you from accessing content or a feature of the site, and you report it to us but do not receive a response, you have the right to submit your complaints or a request to the Defender of Rights.

Several options are available to you: